Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the wp-fail2ban domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6170

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the wptelegram-pro domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6170

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the wptelegram domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6170
Adam Back dismisses BIP-110 censorship claims as fork debate returns – TON BOT

Adam Back dismisses BIP-110 censorship claims as fork debate returns

A debate over Bitcoin’s BIP-110 moderation resurfaced online, with Mr.Hodl linking Roger Ver and GrassFedBitcoin. GrassFedBitcoin complained about censorship in BIP-110 discussion channels. Adam Back rejected claims of censorship, stating that the proposal was being ignored due to its lack of support. The proposal aims to restrict non-monetary data in Bitcoin transactions, with supporters and critics divided on its potential risks and benefits.


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *